SEED - EDITOR’ S INTRODUCTION
The following articles are by
authors who presented papers either at the 4th Gatherings in Biosemiotics Conference in Prague, July 2004 or at the 5th
Gatherings in Biosemiotics in Urbino,
Italy in July 2005. Each of the papers in question handles issues connected
with the extension of Biosemiotic ideas, against
received doctrines. In the first paper, for example, Dario Martinelli, is concerned
with the extension of biosemiotic ideas from the
field of ethno-musicology. The latter concerns itself with the structure of
human created and performed music in many cultures of the world; he argues that
this field should be extended to non-human music. Both human music and
non-human music show structural similarities; this leads him to the provocative
proposition that, since all cases of human music-making exhibit a considerable
range of aesthetic ideas in relation to sound, so the demonstrated array of
variation among each species of sound-making non-human animals also reveals the
existence of an aesthetic.
The next three papers deal
with alternatives to received thinking in biology and medicine. Guenther Witzany discusses how the radical revisions to evolutionary
theory by Lynn Margulis Serial Endosymbiotic
Theory (SET) leads him to the conclusion that there is an enormous world of
communicative interactions ignored in conventional biology, and that following
on from Margulis ideas, that symbiogenesis
exhibits a wide range of rule-governed sign mediated interactions (or rsi) These communicative interactions are not only
evident and open to descriptive evaluation but have pragmatic aspects as well. Witzany examines these pragmatic dimensions. The article by
Queiroz, Emmeche and El Hani is part of a series of articles in which they are
exploring how the ideas of C. S. Peirce can better
explain communicative activities at the molecular dimension than can current
examples of information theory. Though the latter is used throughout biology,
it is a theory in which the relation of the gene to the cell is entirely absent
of meaning. Their article is a ground-breaking approach which demonstrates in
detail an alternative explanatory schema in molecular biology.
Finally, Neuman
takes issue with current explanations of autoimmunity, in which the process of
autoimmunity is described in various terms of “self” in relation to an “other”
(pathogens, virus, etc). Using various semiotic ideas, drawn from such authors
as Volosinov, Neuman
discusses why the processes of the immune system might better be analysed in
terms of “context.” The ability to act in context implies an ability to
distinguish meanings. Neuman argues that because the
immune system is meaningful, contextual understanding is one of its major
features..